Can ideas be treated as assets which can be bought and sold? Why not? If an idea can have tangible impact on something real and lead to savings or additional revenue or a whole new profitable business, it can be valued. What is open to valuation is also open to buying and selling.
Fair points all. My thought comes from a different angle. I was speculating if the new business value chain can be further deconstructed. As of now, the presence of venture capitalists and angel investors makes sure that those with ideas get sufficient funds to make it into a business. I was wondering if we can go a step forward and take the idea from a third source. I have often met people who want to start something of their own but don’t have a clear idea what. I have also met lot of other people (myself included) who have quite a few interesting ideas which unfortunately can’t be taken to conclusion because either lack of risk appetite or simply the leverage to make it happen (e.g. improved power plant for example) or a general lack of interest in the allied logistical activities of taking an idea to fruition.
The assumption is that there is a group of people who is interested in being on their own. There is another group of people who is interested in generating ideas and expounding on them. Also, the former don’t always have a great idea to start with. And above all, the latter do not always want to take the idea from blueprint to bluechip. How would it work? The to-be entrepreneur contacts the ideas market for potential candidates. She is showcased some ideas (to the extent can be done without divulging the entire idea). She chooses a few candidates that fit the bill. There are investors already aligned with the ideas or are shown the business plan after expounding on the idea. If the investors like it, they fund the business and the idea generator is paid in cash or in stock of the company or a combination. She can be involved in the early stage development of the idea as well.
There is of course an obvious variant. This is where a large company replaces the VC and the entrepreneur. The large company looks at an idea in its domain or one it is keen on entering. It allocates the responsibility of taking it through to an entrepreneurial employee within the company (or one recruited for the purpose). It gives her a budget and asks her to make a plan in collaboration with the idea generator. Payment can be either stock or cash or both. Though in all likelihood in this case it would be cash. If so, the idea generator can go shopping about subject to certain rules.
This decouples the modern enterprise further amongst the source of idea, entrepreneurship and capital. The entrepreneur is someone who likes a certain mode of working and takes pleasure in the all-or-nothing fortune of the business whereas the capital owner want to make a big buck for the risks undertaken. There is still space for the idea generator who has a bright idea but not either the willingness or the wherewithal or both to take it forward. I am making a fine distinction between the entrepreneur and the idea generator. That is from my personal experience. I have indeed come across individuals who do not mind the risk of entrepreneurship on account of several factors e.g. high employability even in case of failure of business, high enough savings to last a while without job, willingness to try out something adventurous for the right reward, quest for a more challenging career. But not all of these are people who have a very convincing or solid idea. Often enough I have heard of people who are waiting for the right idea. I have also come across our batchmates who started a specific business after contemplating on several different ones and having taken at least one other business to an investor as well. They in fact quit their jobs without having finalized what to start.
The other source of ideas is the previous generation experts in various fields. They keep coming across interesting business ideas explicitly or implicitly all the time. They themselves rarely have the enthusiasm, risk appetite or even risk taking ability to start up on their own. They informally pass on the thoughts to someone else who might be interested.
A centralized marketplace for ideas would bring together idea generators and potential users from across the country (and even the globe) who would have otherwise never met each other. Once this marketplace become vibrant enough for the start up businesses, the other not so willing participants can join the fray. There is no need to restrict the ideas exchange for only the start up ventures. Ideas can be smaller as well. And ideas also do not need to originate in thin air and then try to locate the buyer. The buyers can indicates what kind of ideas they are looking for and thus give a direction to the generators. To be fair, this latter thing does happen informally in certain settings. People have used this marketing gimmick at a very preliminary stage to get people excited about a certain movie (“name your movie yourself” or “draw the plot of the serial” etc). But these efforts were mostly marketing stunts. A genuine request for ideas (RFP of sorts) has not become the accepted practice yet.
How useful would it be? Internet can certainly enable the coming together, RFP process, general pooling with limited disclosure. The larger question is how comfortable would the prospective entrepreneurs be in taking someone else’s idea and pushing it to the next level? How comfortable would businesses be in asking for ideas from without when they are paying good money to their employees who are supposed to be doing that? The bigger question is whether the free flow of ideas is warranted at this stage and if so, are we attitudinally prepared for it?
Swapnil
Wadala
19 August 2007